While Tiger does finally appear to be "back" at the top of the game, having won 3 of his last 6 tournaments including the last two he has entered, the message suggests that all of his infamous personal flaws should be forgotten because he is the world's best golfer. Not surprisingly, this message isn't sitting too well with everybody. The question is, did Nike put its brand equity at risk with the contentious statement?
My view is that while Nike will not win any new fans and its not a play I would have suggested, the bold message echos the sentiment of many golf fans who are ready to move on from the Tiger train wreck of yesteryear and see him make a serious run at Jack Nicklaus's record of 18 majors. In this way the ad can be viewed as distinctly honest and has a chance to connect with its core target consumer. To Nike's credit, it has stood-by Tiger while his standing in golf plunged and most other sponsors jumped ship, so there's no doubt Nike has much to gain from watching Tiger regain his status.
The bigger question is why would Tiger's publicist allow Nike to post this ad? I see more harm to his brand than Nike's as it seems like a counterproductive message for a man who should be working on humanizing his image. That said, Tiger has quietly been picking up new sponsors (e.g., Rolex), while returning to a more active role with some of his other longer-term sponsors (e.g., EA Sport), so maybe winning really does take care of everything afterall...
The bigger question is why would Tiger's publicist allow Nike to post this ad? I see more harm to his brand than Nike's as it seems like a counterproductive message for a man who should be working on humanizing his image. That said, Tiger has quietly been picking up new sponsors (e.g., Rolex), while returning to a more active role with some of his other longer-term sponsors (e.g., EA Sport), so maybe winning really does take care of everything afterall...
No comments:
Post a Comment